Who Marks This, and What They Have No Business Marking

We're a small team that reads the records peptide brands publish, from a browser, on a set date. That's it.

We're not a lab, not clinicians, and not in a position to tell anyone what to use. This page explains both halves.

Who are we?

We run a scoring site, and a commercial one. Our domain name says best, and we've checked exactly one brand so far.

We don't claim any named expert. Our marks aren't a specialist's opinion. They come from seven checks you could run yourself, applied the same way to every brand. That's why we print the checks before the table: the value is in the checks, not in us.

What can't we do?

We have no lab. We ran no tests and opened no vials. During our 2026-09-01 checks we didn't contact any standards body or confirm anything with a testing lab. That's why one cell on the one scored row reads STATED ONLY, not met.

So we never turn a lab result into a statement about a person, a body or an outcome. What we can do is read what a company published, and ask whether a stranger could find the same document.

What does a filled cell tell you?

Only that a document exists and says what it says. It tells you nothing about safety, suitability or effect, for anyone. The count is just filled cells in one row on one date. It isn't a comparison with other rows.

We score records, not results. A purity figure is only as sound as the document it sits in, so no check rewards a high number. If you want the number, read it in the document.

Can a brand ask for a correction?

Yes. It sends us the document that settles the check, and we re-mark that row on the same seven checks and date it again.

A document changes a cell, never a position, because brands are listed A to Z. The full rules are in the marking rules.

Which brand did we check?

Peptara Labs, at peptaralabs.io. It's the only row on the scorecard with anything filled in.